<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Global warming: A new war of religion?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://richarddnorth.com/2009/11/global-warming-a-new-war-of-religion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://richarddnorth.com/2009/11/global-warming-a-new-war-of-religion/</link>
	<description>Richard D North welcomes you to his new blog. (It links to my old site, now archived.) I am a right-winger, in love with the free market and arguing against the soft-left, liberal, green, PC consensus. Oh, and I&#039;m a conflicted softie. A bit hippy and arty round the edges too.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 11:35:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcel Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://richarddnorth.com/2009/11/global-warming-a-new-war-of-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-1929</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcel Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 08:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richarddnorth.com/?p=877#comment-1929</guid>
		<description>&quot;Almost all intelligent free market people loathe anthropogenic climate change as an idea&quot;

No intelligent person loathes an empirical matter as an idea; regardless of what you think of these people or what they think of themselves, such people are actually quite stupid.

&quot;and almost all intelligent green-minded or lefty people love it&quot;

Such people are likewise stupid, but your claim is grossly dishonest and in error -- the vast majority of people who accept AGW do so with great reluctance as a result of the science directly or as stated by 97% of climate scientists and every reputable scientific organization in the world.

&quot;Mike Hulme, for instance, declared himself to be a fan of government action because he believed in merits of government interference.&quot;

No intelligent person forms conclusions from a sample space of one element.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Almost all intelligent free market people loathe anthropogenic climate change as an idea&#8221;</p>
<p>No intelligent person loathes an empirical matter as an idea; regardless of what you think of these people or what they think of themselves, such people are actually quite stupid.</p>
<p>&#8220;and almost all intelligent green-minded or lefty people love it&#8221;</p>
<p>Such people are likewise stupid, but your claim is grossly dishonest and in error &#8212; the vast majority of people who accept AGW do so with great reluctance as a result of the science directly or as stated by 97% of climate scientists and every reputable scientific organization in the world.</p>
<p>&#8220;Mike Hulme, for instance, declared himself to be a fan of government action because he believed in merits of government interference.&#8221;</p>
<p>No intelligent person forms conclusions from a sample space of one element.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jameshigham</title>
		<link>http://richarddnorth.com/2009/11/global-warming-a-new-war-of-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-1921</link>
		<dc:creator>jameshigham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richarddnorth.com/?p=877#comment-1921</guid>
		<description>that climate change is becoming a secular religion

Hardly a secular religion at all.  It&#039;s very much a full-blown religion with links to some quite ancient entities as mentioned in the post &quot;let me introduce myself&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that climate change is becoming a secular religion</p>
<p>Hardly a secular religion at all.  It&#8217;s very much a full-blown religion with links to some quite ancient entities as mentioned in the post &#8220;let me introduce myself&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
