<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Richard D North &#187; society</title>
	<atom:link href="http://richarddnorth.com/tag/society/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://richarddnorth.com</link>
	<description>Richard D North welcomes you to his new blog. (It links to my old site, now archived.) I am a right-winger, in love with the free market and arguing against the soft-left, liberal, green, PC consensus. Oh, and I&#039;m a conflicted softie. A bit hippy and arty round the edges too.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:15:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Hating Thatcher</title>
		<link>http://richarddnorth.com/2008/11/hating-thatcher/</link>
		<comments>http://richarddnorth.com/2008/11/hating-thatcher/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RDN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics and campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rightist manifestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thatcher]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richarddnorth.com/?p=187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mrs Thatcher was divisive, illiberal, militaristic and thought there was &#8220;no such thing as society&#8221;. Easy to hate the old bitch, then. And wrong.
I confess it. I never liked Mrs T. She seemed shrill, self-righteous, bossy, narrow-minded, uncultured. The St Francis stuff made me quite queasy. I was never the kind of public schoolboy who [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://richarddnorth.com/2009/10/bland-cannot-be-the-new-tory-brand/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Bland cannot be the new Tory brand'>Bland cannot be the new Tory brand</a> <small>An Op Ed style comment piece to coincide with the publication...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://richarddnorth.com/2009/12/mail-on-sunday-rdn-not-guilty/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Mail On Sunday: RDN not guilty'>Mail On Sunday: RDN not guilty</a> <small>Dear Reader, I didn&#8217;t write the piece which appeared under...</small></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mrs Thatcher was divisive, illiberal, militaristic and thought there was &#8220;no such thing as society&#8221;. Easy to hate the old bitch, then. And wrong.<span id="more-187"></span></p>
<p>I confess it. I never liked Mrs T. She seemed shrill, self-righteous, bossy, narrow-minded, uncultured. The St Francis stuff made me quite queasy. I was never the kind of public schoolboy who was erotically drawn to the Sybil Fawlty sort of stridency. I did however at least recognise that she was mostly right. Hating her seemed silly.</p>
<p>Nearly all kindly people hated Mrs Thatcher and plenty of them still do. <a title="Tilda Swinton on Thatcher" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/audio/2008/nov/22/tilda-swinton" target="_blank">Tilda Swinton</a> makes one sort of case. <a title="Eddie Izzard on Thatcher" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?view=DETAILS&amp;grid=&amp;xml=/arts/2008/11/21/btizzard121.xml" target="_blank">Eddie Izzard</a> makes another. Consider the roll-call of bad reasons to dislike her. (I take it that my own reasons were more excusable.)</p>
<p>Old sexists hated the fact that she was a clever and effective woman.</p>
<p>Feminists hated her for not caring about them (and for wearing old fashioned feminine clothes).</p>
<p>The snobbish Establishment hated her for being lower-middle class (and being suspicious of them).</p>
<p>Liberals hated her for being frankly unpermissive and pre-Beatle.</p>
<p>Insecure men hated her because she was sexy in an unabashed way.</p>
<p>Socialists hated her for loving entrepreneurs.</p>
<p>Sociologists hated her for realising that &#8220;there&#8217;s no such thing as society&#8221;. In other words, there isn&#8217;t a machine which makes us, but rather a world made by individuals who have responsibility for it and for themselves.</p>
<p>Wimps hated her because she thought the British military was one of the few things which long years of pseudo-socialism hadn&#8217;t wrecked (Tony Blair ended up with much the same view).</p>
<p>The coal-miners union hated her for realising that either British coal-mining would pay its way, or it should cease. (She got rid of far fewer coal-miners than successive Labour governments had.)</p>
<p>The welfare state hated her for destroying services. (She didn&#8217;t: she couldn&#8217;t stop the thing growing even though she&#8217;d have liked to.)</p>
<p>The point about Mrs Thatcher was that she struck a note of clarity and that millions of people responded to it. Britain in the late 1970s was at the end of a period of fudge and compromise. One could defend the accommodation the elite, the masses, the unions and everyone else had come to. It had a sort of decency. But it was corrupt and clapped out and many of us knew it. It couldn&#8217;t be got rid of politely. It was only someone impolite could do the work.</p>
<p>What is so wickedly bad about hating Mrs T is that it ignores the way she was so triumphantly British. She was made by Britain and she helped move the project on.</p>
<p>The way this happened is of importance.</p>
<p>She wasn&#8217;t a revolutionary and her thinking wasn&#8217;t new. Ted Heath had tried to be Thatcherite when he was briefly &#8220;Selsdon Man&#8221;. But he was scared-off by the left and the centrists. Even Harold Wilson had tried to &#8220;smash&#8221; the unions. But Mrs T had the balls to be hated in ways those men didn&#8217;t dare. And anyway, the country was ready for a bit of briskness by the time she came along. &#8220;You turn if you want to, the Lady&#8217;s not for turning&#8221; was a disparaching echo of Ted Heath&#8217;s change of heart in the early 70s.</p>
<p>Tony Blair has served his country by embedding the Thatcherite revolution in New Labour&#8217;s view of the world. But he was a fraud when he presented himself as being the evolutionary force which softened Thatcherism so it was fit for modern and progressive purpose. John Major had already provided a crucial bridge between the two cultures. It was lucky for New Labour that it was able to bury his Tory &#8220;niceness&#8221; under a torrent of (largely unjustified) accusations about Tory sleaze.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://richarddnorth.com/2009/10/bland-cannot-be-the-new-tory-brand/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Bland cannot be the new Tory brand'>Bland cannot be the new Tory brand</a> <small>An Op Ed style comment piece to coincide with the publication...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://richarddnorth.com/2009/12/mail-on-sunday-rdn-not-guilty/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Mail On Sunday: RDN not guilty'>Mail On Sunday: RDN not guilty</a> <small>Dear Reader, I didn&#8217;t write the piece which appeared under...</small></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://richarddnorth.com/2008/11/hating-thatcher/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
