<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting past the Web&#8217;s nonsense</title>
	<atom:link href="https://richarddnorth.com/archived-sites/livingissues/2008/09/17/getting-past-the-webs-nonsense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://richarddnorth.com/archived-sites/livingissues/2008/09/17/getting-past-the-webs-nonsense/</link>
	<description>We help you unpick media stories about the big issues of our time. We help you judge the quality of the arguments put by campaigners, politicians, commentators. We operate as a "reality check". We are a check on spin – wherever it comes from.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 18:56:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Berners-Lee is on to something &#124; 21st-century PR issues › Paul Seaman's online review</title>
		<link>https://richarddnorth.com/archived-sites/livingissues/2008/09/17/getting-past-the-webs-nonsense/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Berners-Lee is on to something &#124; 21st-century PR issues › Paul Seaman's online review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 18:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richarddnorth.com/archived-sites/livingissues/?p=124#comment-18</guid>
		<description>[...] don’t pretend to have all the answers, though I do explore some of them here. My starting point is that the PR industry has a very big stake in the outcome of this debate. We [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] don’t pretend to have all the answers, though I do explore some of them here. My starting point is that the PR industry has a very big stake in the outcome of this debate. We [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Time to praise tech giants &#124; 21st-century PR issues › Paul Seaman's online review</title>
		<link>https://richarddnorth.com/archived-sites/livingissues/2008/09/17/getting-past-the-webs-nonsense/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Time to praise tech giants &#124; 21st-century PR issues › Paul Seaman's online review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 18:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richarddnorth.com/archived-sites/livingissues/?p=124#comment-16</guid>
		<description>[...] protecting, an effective means of branding credible sources we can trust should be developed. I think so, too. This is a debate everybody involved in Web 2.0 PR has a legitimate self-interest in shaping. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] protecting, an effective means of branding credible sources we can trust should be developed. I think so, too. This is a debate everybody involved in Web 2.0 PR has a legitimate self-interest in shaping. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
