What do conservatives conserve?

Conservatives believe that we ought to preserve many of the values of the past. So how come they like capitalism which keeps changing the world?

It would be typical of political language if “conservatives” were progressives. Well, some are. The free market libertarian conservative thinks that entrepreneurs throw up changes – not least in technology – that will make life better. Such a person is inclined to sneer that the soft-left, liberal green campaigners are Luddites who hate progress. But conservatives really do like their history.

But hang on. Aren’t the left often described as progressive because they believe that life can get better and better if only we have enough politcial reform and taxation?

All the above is true and complicated. And here’s another problem. Both left and right are always claiming that history belongs to them. The left says history is one long struggle to get a fair deal for everyone. The right says it cares about the institutions we have been bequeathed from history, by which it tends to mean the bits that didn’t get reformed by the left.

So the left sees Chartists and Magna Carta and anti-slavery movements and the right sees the Monarchy and soldiers in gorgeous uniforms and clubs in Pall Mall.

Actually, the right is very complicated. Many of its thinkers and politicians are people who struggled out of the working class to education, affluence and power and are quite inclined to draw a different line. They say that if they can do it, anyone can.

But to get back to the history.

I can say that my conservatism looks back at the history of my society and insists that there is great merit there. And I mean that I claim the oppressed and the oppressers as both part of a historical continuum which I feel myself to be the heir of. My conservatism insists that I don’t want my age to throw away the pain and glories of the past. I am happy to see the merit in everything in my national past, including Empire.

It happens that this view is enriched by my understanding that I am in some form a world citizen. I am conscious that, say, the British Empire was not entirely noble. But I insist that it had great nobility and was in any case extraordinary and richly human.

So it comes to this. I think a conservative says that the main lesson of the past is to build on it and to remember that we have a hard job to live up to the courage and talent we can see in every class and nation  there. I think the liberal and leftist mind is more inclined to say that we have really only to enjoy, relish and build on the work of the reformers and even the revolutionaries of history.

And finally, the conservative Briton does say that when he looks at history, there is a lot to be said for the so-called oppressors amongst his ancestors. They made a lot of stuff happen, much of it very good.

Comments

Kathryn Evans
08/02/11
You say, ' a conservative says that the main lesson of the past is to build on it and to remember that we have a hard job to live up to the courage and talent we can see in every class and nation there.' And yet, you want to hack our library service to pieces - a service that has stood the test of time, that continues to serve people, providing them with free resource from which to better themselves. A service that lifted many people, including myself, from working class backgrounds and enabled them to go to university. ''Conservatives believe that we ought to preserve many of the values of the past' - do you iinclude democracy in that? Freedom of Speech? Our library service utterly underpins our culture, what we value as a nation - access to knowledge and information for all - it is the very foundation of society. You made me very angry today Richard D North. You came across as very ignorant on Radio 4. perhaps you should visit your local library, see for yourself the service it provides - spend an hour or two after school watching the children, or drop in mid-morning when the pensioners are in - or try Saturdays when the students tend to be about. Ah, but I missed your last sentence: 'there is a lot to be said for the so-called oppressors amongst his ancestors' - is that really what you're about - close the libraries, lock up easy information for the priveleged and wealthy? You sound like a book burner Richard D North - do you realise that? Do you approve of that type of oppression? You said we wouldn't choose to build a library service if we had the choice today - the thing iis, Richard D north, we don't have to. We already have one. Keep your hands off it. It belongs to the people.
Mr. B.P. Staggers
08/02/11
Lazy blog, lazily written. What did i expect?

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Publication date

22 November 2008

Comments

2 comments